Do I take the traditional route of joining squares or triangles or hexagons? Rigid shapes with exacting measurements that allow no leeway for fuck-ups? A challenge! Woo!
Or do I go down the wacky path? With no fixed pattern drawn up and joining pieces of fabric of different shapes and sizes by "feel", freeform-ing it all the way until I hit a queen-size rectangle?
See these ass-patching that I've done on various pairs of our old shorts over the years? I've really enjoyed making the "pattern" up as I went along. So maybe the less structured and thus more forgiving (when mistakes are unintentionally made) method is the way to go for a novice? And, planning for the future, if I actually complete a quilt and have it for life, when repairs might have to be made, I can patch it Japanese boro-style without fear of wrecking the consistency in pattern because there isn't one! Haha. Yes? No? Advice? Maybe I need to sleep on it (wahahaha!) a little bit more. And then there's the colourway question to be answered! Arggghhhh!
2 comments:
Hey funny about the quilting bug. I've decided with the traditional to start off with because I'm pretty instruction-oriented but I think you're the type to just start cutting and stitching!!
Lien!!!!
I'm pretty instructed-oriented too - I love reading instruction manuals!
But I think if I go the traditional way, I'll get bored pretty quickly (and maybe never finish the quilt) because I've already seen the pattern and know how the end result will look?
I think the "freeform" method will keep me interested for longer (long enough, I hope, to finish the project) because I don't know where each patch is going to take me?
Have you started on yours?
I'll be emailing you for hints and tips when I start mine!
xx
Post a Comment